When Intervention is Needed: Surgical Options for Vesicoureteral Reflux
While many cases of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR), especially lower grades, can be effectively managed with observation and prophylactic antibiotics, surgical intervention may be necessary for children with higher grades of reflux (III, IV, and V), those who experience recurrent breakthrough urinary tract infections (UTIs) despite medical management, or those with persistent symptoms. The goal of surgery for VUR is to correct the anatomical defect at the ureterovesical junction, creating a functional one-way valve that prevents the backward flow of urine.
https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/vesicoureteral-reflux-market-3982
The most common surgical approach for VUR correction is ureteral reimplantation. This procedure involves surgically detaching the ureter(s) from the bladder and re-implanting them at a different location in the bladder wall, creating a longer submucosal tunnel. The submucosal tunnel is the portion of the ureter that runs within the bladder wall before entering the bladder cavity. A longer tunnel helps to compress the ureter during bladder contraction, acting as a natural valve to prevent reflux.
Ureteral reimplantation can be performed using different surgical techniques, including:
Open Surgery: This involves a traditional abdominal incision to access the bladder and ureters. While effective, it typically requires a longer hospital stay and recovery period compared to minimally invasive approaches.
Laparoscopic Surgery: This minimally invasive technique uses small incisions in the abdomen through which a laparoscope (a thin tube with a camera) and specialized surgical instruments are inserted. The surgeon performs the reimplantation through these small incisions, guided by the video images. Laparoscopic surgery generally results in smaller scars, less pain, and a shorter recovery time.
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: This is a more advanced minimally invasive technique where the surgeon uses robotic arms to perform the surgery with enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualization. Similar to laparoscopic surgery, it offers the benefits of smaller incisions and faster recovery.
The choice of surgical technique depends on various factors, including the child's age, the grade of reflux, the surgeon's experience, and the available resources.
Another less invasive surgical option for VUR correction is endoscopic injection (STING or HIT procedure). This procedure is typically considered for lower to moderate grades of VUR. It involves using a cystoscope (a thin, flexible tube with a camera) inserted through the urethra into the bladder. A bulking agent, such as dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Deflux) or polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique), is then injected into the bladder wall just below the opening of the affected ureter. This creates a small bulge that narrows the ureteral opening and helps to prevent reflux.
Endoscopic injection is a shorter outpatient procedure with a quicker recovery compared to open or laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation. However, its success rates may be lower, and multiple injections may be needed to achieve complete resolution of reflux. It is often considered a less invasive first-line surgical option for certain patients.
The decision to proceed with surgical intervention for VUR is a significant one that should be made after a thorough discussion with a pediatric urologist. The potential benefits of surgery include a higher chance of resolving the reflux, reducing the risk of recurrent UTIs and kidney damage, and potentially allowing the child to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics. However, surgery also carries potential risks, such as bleeding, infection, ureteral obstruction, and the need for further surgery.
Post-operative care after ureteral reimplantation typically involves a hospital stay of a few days, pain management, and a temporary urinary catheter to drain the bladder. Activity restrictions are usually in place for several weeks to allow the surgical sites to heal. Follow-up appointments and imaging studies (like VCUG) are scheduled to assess the success of the surgery.
In conclusion, surgical options, particularly ureteral reimplantation and endoscopic injection, offer effective ways to correct VUR when medical management is not sufficient. The choice of surgical approach depends on individual factors, and a detailed discussion with a pediatric urologist is essential to determine the best course of action to protect the child's long-term kidney health.
While many cases of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR), especially lower grades, can be effectively managed with observation and prophylactic antibiotics, surgical intervention may be necessary for children with higher grades of reflux (III, IV, and V), those who experience recurrent breakthrough urinary tract infections (UTIs) despite medical management, or those with persistent symptoms. The goal of surgery for VUR is to correct the anatomical defect at the ureterovesical junction, creating a functional one-way valve that prevents the backward flow of urine.
https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/vesicoureteral-reflux-market-3982
The most common surgical approach for VUR correction is ureteral reimplantation. This procedure involves surgically detaching the ureter(s) from the bladder and re-implanting them at a different location in the bladder wall, creating a longer submucosal tunnel. The submucosal tunnel is the portion of the ureter that runs within the bladder wall before entering the bladder cavity. A longer tunnel helps to compress the ureter during bladder contraction, acting as a natural valve to prevent reflux.
Ureteral reimplantation can be performed using different surgical techniques, including:
Open Surgery: This involves a traditional abdominal incision to access the bladder and ureters. While effective, it typically requires a longer hospital stay and recovery period compared to minimally invasive approaches.
Laparoscopic Surgery: This minimally invasive technique uses small incisions in the abdomen through which a laparoscope (a thin tube with a camera) and specialized surgical instruments are inserted. The surgeon performs the reimplantation through these small incisions, guided by the video images. Laparoscopic surgery generally results in smaller scars, less pain, and a shorter recovery time.
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: This is a more advanced minimally invasive technique where the surgeon uses robotic arms to perform the surgery with enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualization. Similar to laparoscopic surgery, it offers the benefits of smaller incisions and faster recovery.
The choice of surgical technique depends on various factors, including the child's age, the grade of reflux, the surgeon's experience, and the available resources.
Another less invasive surgical option for VUR correction is endoscopic injection (STING or HIT procedure). This procedure is typically considered for lower to moderate grades of VUR. It involves using a cystoscope (a thin, flexible tube with a camera) inserted through the urethra into the bladder. A bulking agent, such as dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Deflux) or polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique), is then injected into the bladder wall just below the opening of the affected ureter. This creates a small bulge that narrows the ureteral opening and helps to prevent reflux.
Endoscopic injection is a shorter outpatient procedure with a quicker recovery compared to open or laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation. However, its success rates may be lower, and multiple injections may be needed to achieve complete resolution of reflux. It is often considered a less invasive first-line surgical option for certain patients.
The decision to proceed with surgical intervention for VUR is a significant one that should be made after a thorough discussion with a pediatric urologist. The potential benefits of surgery include a higher chance of resolving the reflux, reducing the risk of recurrent UTIs and kidney damage, and potentially allowing the child to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics. However, surgery also carries potential risks, such as bleeding, infection, ureteral obstruction, and the need for further surgery.
Post-operative care after ureteral reimplantation typically involves a hospital stay of a few days, pain management, and a temporary urinary catheter to drain the bladder. Activity restrictions are usually in place for several weeks to allow the surgical sites to heal. Follow-up appointments and imaging studies (like VCUG) are scheduled to assess the success of the surgery.
In conclusion, surgical options, particularly ureteral reimplantation and endoscopic injection, offer effective ways to correct VUR when medical management is not sufficient. The choice of surgical approach depends on individual factors, and a detailed discussion with a pediatric urologist is essential to determine the best course of action to protect the child's long-term kidney health.
When Intervention is Needed: Surgical Options for Vesicoureteral Reflux
While many cases of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR), especially lower grades, can be effectively managed with observation and prophylactic antibiotics, surgical intervention may be necessary for children with higher grades of reflux (III, IV, and V), those who experience recurrent breakthrough urinary tract infections (UTIs) despite medical management, or those with persistent symptoms. The goal of surgery for VUR is to correct the anatomical defect at the ureterovesical junction, creating a functional one-way valve that prevents the backward flow of urine.
https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/vesicoureteral-reflux-market-3982
The most common surgical approach for VUR correction is ureteral reimplantation. This procedure involves surgically detaching the ureter(s) from the bladder and re-implanting them at a different location in the bladder wall, creating a longer submucosal tunnel. The submucosal tunnel is the portion of the ureter that runs within the bladder wall before entering the bladder cavity. A longer tunnel helps to compress the ureter during bladder contraction, acting as a natural valve to prevent reflux.
Ureteral reimplantation can be performed using different surgical techniques, including:
Open Surgery: This involves a traditional abdominal incision to access the bladder and ureters. While effective, it typically requires a longer hospital stay and recovery period compared to minimally invasive approaches.
Laparoscopic Surgery: This minimally invasive technique uses small incisions in the abdomen through which a laparoscope (a thin tube with a camera) and specialized surgical instruments are inserted. The surgeon performs the reimplantation through these small incisions, guided by the video images. Laparoscopic surgery generally results in smaller scars, less pain, and a shorter recovery time.
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: This is a more advanced minimally invasive technique where the surgeon uses robotic arms to perform the surgery with enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualization. Similar to laparoscopic surgery, it offers the benefits of smaller incisions and faster recovery.
The choice of surgical technique depends on various factors, including the child's age, the grade of reflux, the surgeon's experience, and the available resources.
Another less invasive surgical option for VUR correction is endoscopic injection (STING or HIT procedure). This procedure is typically considered for lower to moderate grades of VUR. It involves using a cystoscope (a thin, flexible tube with a camera) inserted through the urethra into the bladder. A bulking agent, such as dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Deflux) or polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique), is then injected into the bladder wall just below the opening of the affected ureter. This creates a small bulge that narrows the ureteral opening and helps to prevent reflux.
Endoscopic injection is a shorter outpatient procedure with a quicker recovery compared to open or laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation. However, its success rates may be lower, and multiple injections may be needed to achieve complete resolution of reflux. It is often considered a less invasive first-line surgical option for certain patients.
The decision to proceed with surgical intervention for VUR is a significant one that should be made after a thorough discussion with a pediatric urologist. The potential benefits of surgery include a higher chance of resolving the reflux, reducing the risk of recurrent UTIs and kidney damage, and potentially allowing the child to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics. However, surgery also carries potential risks, such as bleeding, infection, ureteral obstruction, and the need for further surgery.
Post-operative care after ureteral reimplantation typically involves a hospital stay of a few days, pain management, and a temporary urinary catheter to drain the bladder. Activity restrictions are usually in place for several weeks to allow the surgical sites to heal. Follow-up appointments and imaging studies (like VCUG) are scheduled to assess the success of the surgery.
In conclusion, surgical options, particularly ureteral reimplantation and endoscopic injection, offer effective ways to correct VUR when medical management is not sufficient. The choice of surgical approach depends on individual factors, and a detailed discussion with a pediatric urologist is essential to determine the best course of action to protect the child's long-term kidney health.
0 Comments
0 Shares